Skip to content
INVICTARacing
Racing explained

PHS and AMS Handicaps Explained (and How They Differ from IRC and ORC)

PHS adjusts a yacht's handicap on its recent results; AMS is a measurement handicap based on ORC data. Here is how both work alongside IRC and ORC in Australia.

2 min read · Updated 19 May 2026

PHS (Performance Handicap System) and AMS (Australian Measurement System) are two of the handicaps that decide Australian races alongside the better-known IRC and ORC. The key distinction is simple: PHS adjusts a boat's handicap on its recent results, while AMS, like IRC and ORC, rates a boat on its measured characteristics. Understanding which is in use is the key to reading any club or regatta result sheet, and it builds on the basics in line honours versus handicap.

PHS — a performance handicap

PHS is a results-based handicap, and it is the workhorse of Australian club racing. Instead of measuring the boat, it gives each yacht a handicap that is adjusted up or down according to how it has recently performed — win a few races and your handicap tightens; struggle and it eases. The principle is much like a golf handicap, continuously levelling the fleet so that on any given day almost any well-sailed boat can win.

Its strengths are simplicity and inclusiveness. No measurement certificate is needed, the paperwork is minimal, and wildly different boats can race together fairly. The trade-off is that it rewards recent form rather than absolute performance, so it is less suited to deciding a serious championship, where a boat could in theory sandbag its handicap.

AMS — a measurement handicap

AMS is a measurement-based handicap administered within the Australian system, drawing on the same measurement data as the international ORC. It uses measured facts about the boat — dimensions, weights, sail areas — to produce a single, fixed handicap for a race, so the rating does not move with results. It is popular in Australia as a more stable, more objective option than PHS, and a simpler one to run than full ORC scoring with its multiple coefficients.

Because it is a measurement system, AMS sits in the same family as IRC and ORC: it rewards sailing the boat to its measured potential, not its recent form.

How they fit together

| System | Type | Basis | | --- | --- | --- | | PHS | Performance | Recent results | | AMS | Measurement | Measured data (Australian) | | IRC | Measurement | Measured data (single, confidential rating) | | ORC | Measurement | Measured data (transparent VPP) |

Many Australian clubs run more than one at once — PHS for the broad, casual fleet and a measurement system such as AMS, ORC or IRC for the serious competitors — so a single race can produce several different winners. None of this applies to strict one-design racing, where identical boats need no handicap at all and the first across the line wins. A boat like the Melges 40 can race one-design and also hold measurement ratings to compete in mixed handicap fleets — see the Melges 40 explained and the boat page.

Frequently asked questions

What is PHS in sailing?
PHS stands for Performance Handicap System, a results-based handicap widely used in Australian club racing. Rather than measuring the boat, it adjusts each yacht's handicap up or down according to how it has recently performed, much like a golf handicap. It lets very different boats and crews race together with minimal paperwork.
What is AMS in sailing?
AMS stands for the Australian Measurement System, a measurement-based handicap administered alongside the international ORC system. It uses measured data about the boat to produce a single, fixed handicap number for a race, and is popular in Australia as a simpler, more stable measurement option than running full ORC scoring.
What is the difference between PHS and IRC or ORC?
IRC, ORC and AMS are measurement handicaps — they rate a boat from its measured characteristics, so the handicap does not change with results. PHS is a performance handicap that moves with how the boat has actually been sailing. Measurement systems reward sailing to a fixed potential; PHS continuously levels the fleet based on recent form.
Which handicap system is best for club racing?
Many Australian clubs run PHS for its simplicity and inclusiveness, often alongside a measurement system such as AMS, ORC or IRC for more serious competitors. PHS is forgiving and needs no certificate, which suits a mixed club fleet, while measurement systems give a more objective result for championship racing.